« Getting the message acrossExporting all your b2evolution posts »

9 comments

Comment from: george kyaw naing [Visitor] Email
george kyaw naingPaying the designer per word count is as ludicrous as measuring software developer's productivity by LOC (number of lines of code) s/he writes.

george kyaw naing


http://ethicminds.blogspot.com/
08/06/10 @ 03:36
Comment from: george kyaw naing [Visitor] Email
george kyaw naingHow can we drive down this cost? Is it because of technology or because of teaching content?

george kyaw naing


http://ethicminds.blogspot.com/
08/06/10 @ 03:38
Comment from: Luke Kempski [Visitor] Email
Luke KempskiI've been in the instructional media business for 20 years and I've come to accept cost per minute/per hour as the starting point for general budget discussions. As long as the range is pretty wide and you qualify the number, I think it's as good as anything to determine feasibility.

I agree with your bullets Mark. Try to quantify anything that can be quanified. We can be most accurate when we can point to a similar course and say we can take a similar approach with this level of media, interactions, features, etc. and it will cost around x per learning experience hour.
09/06/10 @ 01:26
Comment from: David [Visitor] Email
DavidI think Luke has it right. The "hour of elearning" is a starting point. We along with other suppllers have used the terms "simple" , "medium" and "complex" to indicate the level of treatment to help the client understand what we proposing. For each of these terms we specify the number of interactions, graphics, video etc per hour along with the type of navigation and feedback.
09/06/10 @ 09:12
Comment from: Mark [Member] Email
Mark@David, @Luke, I take your point about the "hour of elearning" being a starting point. But it still feels wrong. It's setting an expectation that the learners will be passive for that length of time. That's probably not at all what anyone wants as an end result, but it's implied and thus runs the risk of becoming embedded in the end result.

Otherwise, how will the client know whether we've delivered what we've said we're going to deliver?
09/06/10 @ 09:28
Comment from: Sofia [Visitor] Email
SofiaI agree with Mark that good elearning is a combination of various elements. We - driven by the market - have set basic, intermediate, advanced hour rates depicting level of interactions, nr of questions, screens etc. However, based on our experience we can more precise measure and hence rate elearning hours, specified for software design.
10/06/10 @ 10:35
Comment from: Clive Brotchie [Visitor] Email
Clive BrotchieAn estimate of learning time could help the business assess the impact of "time away from the job".

Apart from that, measures like learning time or treatment levels, are pretty meaningless because they look at inputs not outcomes. A more useful measure would be one which described the potential for the resource to address a performance gap. Again, that is problematic unless many other hard to measure variables - like motivation or the impact of other learning processes going on - are also considered.

Confidence in a learning time estimate might be increased with evidence of usability, learnability and performance improvement gained by evaluating representative user samples. Not easy to do, of course, when bidding for work
11/06/10 @ 05:13
Comment from: Mark [Member] Email
Mark@Clive, I agree that the measures we try to use for outputs are more useful, but also far more problematic and complex than any input measures. I can't see us bidding for work any time soon where we charge based on the output measures. ;-)

I think, for the moment, we're stuck with input measurements. It's just a matter of making those measurements more closely reflect the reality of what is actually to be produced.
11/06/10 @ 08:08
Comment from: george kyaw naing [Visitor] Email
george kyaw naingI also agree with the bullet points in the article. They are simple enough to measure and to understand for the clients.

We need to deal with them in such a way that they see clearly we are working in their best interest. In software development, for example, we help the clients see the workload, the complexity, the time required etc --- by means of feature, the task involved in a feature, the steps involved in a task and so on.

I find you article very helpful.

george kyaw naing
http://ethicminds.blogspot.com/
14/06/10 @ 03:15
Contact. ©2014 by Mark Berthelemy. blog software / hosting / monetize blog.
Design & icons by N.Design Studio. Skin by Tender Feelings / EvoFactory.